Monopsony and the Efficiency of Labour Market Interventions
نویسنده
چکیده
Implicit in many discussions of labour market policy is the assumption that, in the absence of interventions, the operation of the labour market is well-approximated by the perfectly competitive model. The merits or demerits of particular policies is then seen as a trade-off between efficiency and equality. This paper analyses the impact of a variety of policies – the minimum wage, trade unions, unemployment insurance, progressive income taxation and restrictions on labour contracts – on efficiency when labour markets in the absence of intervention are monopsonistic and not perfectly competitive. A simple version of the Burdett and Mortensen (1998) model is used for this purpose. JEL classification: J0
منابع مشابه
The Real Thin Theory: Monopsony in Modern Labour Markets
Models of ‘modern monopsony’ based on job differentiation and/or search frictions seem to give employers non-negligible market power over their workers while avoiding the assumption of ‘classical monopsony’ that employers are large in relation to the size of the labour market that many labour economists find implausible. But, this paper argues that this is somewhat of an illusion because modern...
متن کاملThe Plant Size-Place Effect: Agglomeration and Monopsony in Labour Markets
This paper shows, using data from both the US and the UK, that average plant size is larger in denser markets. However, many popular theories of agglomeration – spillovers, cost advantages and improved match quality – predict that establishments should be smaller in cities. The paper proposes a theory based on monopsony in labour markets that can explain the stylized fact – that firms in all la...
متن کاملPRELIMINARY – COMMENTS WELCOME The Plant Size-Place Effect: Agglomeration and Monopsony in Labour Markets
This paper shows, using data from both the US and the UK, that average establishment size is larger in denser market areas. However, canonical versions of theories of agglomeration – spill-overs, cost advantages and improved match quality – all predict that establishments should be smaller in cities. The paper proposes a theory based on monopsony in labour markets that can explain the stylized ...
متن کاملThe comparative efficiency of ad valorem and specific taxes under monopoly and monopsony
It is well known that ad valorem taxes welfare-dominate specific taxes under monopoly. This paper demonstrates that the comparative welfare ranking of the two instruments reverses under monopsony. The relative performance of alternative tax forms is thus highly sensitive to whether the buyer or seller has market power.
متن کاملAn Empirical Equilibrium Search Model of the Labour Market
In structural empirical models of labour market search, the distribution of wage offers is usually assumed to be exogenous. Because in setting their wages profit-maximizing firms should consider the reservation wages of job seekers, this assumption is hard to justify. In this paper we estimate a structural equilibrium search model in which the wage offer distribution is endogenous. The model ta...
متن کامل